Baby furries came out in droves to the weekly office our of Robin Linden yesterday. My modest laptop couldn’t keep up with the slowdown connected to the massive gathering, spread out over two sims. Just before the start I got redmapped - I had a hell of a time getting back in to the sim south of Robin’s office area and couldn’t possibly enter the area itself. Since flying about went in leaps and bounds, there is no way I can reproduce the debate for you. Snippets, at best, about concerns relating to a notice issued by Linden Lab:
Dear Second Life Resident:
Linden Lab would like to inform you that your land or business is possibly not in compliance with Second Life’s Community Standards. The depiction of sexual activity involving minors may violate real-world laws in some areas, and the Second Life community as a whole has made it clear that it views such behavior to be broadly offensive.
Linden Lab chooses not to allow the advertising or promotion of age play or related activities in any public forum — including in-world textures, classified ads, the Second Life forums, or parcel descriptions.
Advertisements, promotions, or descriptions of such activities must be
removed to avoid account sanctions. Any account asserting an age that does
not meet Second Life’s minimum age of eligibility will be closed.
Linden Lab
The reply read thus:
At 17:00 on March 8th, 2007, there will be a peaceful civil rights demonstration at the office of Robin Linden in protest of the sudden enforcement of restrictive and discriminatory ageplayer policies spurred on because of Fox News’ biased and slanted Video Blog Report.
Many harmless people are needlessly being pushed into the shadows merely for being “offensive”. SecondLife’s public image should not overshadow the founding principles it was founded on, especially when their blanket actions hurts the lives of many citizens of SecondLife who are causing no harm to other citizens.
As I said - no description of the debate is possible. But although I am absolutely no age play advocate and steer clear of such places, there are a few things to be said about the LL notice. First of all I wonder what the laws are in ’some areas’ and, of course, what areas are meant. Homosexuality is outlawed, too, in ’some areas’. Whether or not age play is your cup of tea is not the question. The question is first and foremost which concerns weigh heavier for Linden Lab - those of publicity and money or those of the freedom f it’s Residents? If a born-again Christian group offers to invest big time in SL ‘if all the sex is kicked out’ or ‘all the gay sims and clubs are closed’, are they going to comply as well?
The depiction of sexual activity involving minors may violate real-world laws in some areas - frankly I can live with that. I have no love lost for those who fantasize about having sex with minors, even if those minors are grown-ups in RL. But what about Linden Lab chooses not to allow the advertising or promotion of age play or related activities? Related activities such as… just being little kids, as a lot of these baby furries enjoy? They need to be more specific at LL.
Anyway, since there was hardly a debate anyway, and I couldn’t follow more than half of it, marooned as I was in Waterhead, offline or trying to move closer in an almost overloaded neighbouring sim, here’s a picture. Grey-out courtesy of Hewlett-Packard…
I spotted three Lindens, by the way, and the presence of spike-headed security chief Chadrick Linden suggests why they were there (with the exception of Robin Linden of course, who was supposed to be there anyway).

I tried for more pictures, but I crashed and gave up. It was very late in Real Life Holland anyway…